ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

比較確認的研究×仮説検定研究×
分野研究デザイン研究デザイン
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1971 (Jöreskog); systematized in organizational research by 2000Early 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)
提唱者Karl Jöreskog (multigroup CFA foundation); Robert Vandenberg & Charles Lance (organizational application)Karl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson
種類Quantitative comparative research designQuantitative confirmatory research design
原典Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603
別名multigroup confirmatory research, cross-group confirmatory study, comparative hypothesis testing design, comparative model testing researchhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design
関連44
概要Comparative confirmatory research tests whether a pre-specified theoretical model or set of hypotheses holds equivalently across two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts. It extends standard confirmatory analysis by explicitly imposing and evaluating equality constraints across groups, determining not only whether a model fits the data but whether its structure, factor loadings, and parameter estimates are comparable across populations. This design is foundational to cross-cultural, multi-site, and subgroup comparison studies.Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Comparative Confirmatory Research · Hypothesis Testing Research. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare