手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 比較古典的グラウンデッド・セオリー× | Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 1967 |
| 提唱者≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Method |
| 原典 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|