手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 比較古典的グラウンデッド・セオリー× | 比較事例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提唱者≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 原典≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 別名 | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|