手法を比較

	Collaboration Distance and Erdős Number Analysis	Scientific Collaboration Index (Co-Authorship Intensity)
分野	計量書誌学	計量書誌学
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2001	1983
提唱者	M. E. J. Newman (collaboration networks); Rodrigo de Castro & Jerrold Grossman (Erdős number)	K. Subramanyam (review and Collaboration Index); S. M. Lawani (collaborative measures)
種類	Network-distance pipeline over co-authorship graphs	Descriptive bibliometric indicators of co-authorship intensity
原典	Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404-409.	Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33-38.
別名	Erdős Number Analysis, Co-Authorship Distance, Collaboration Geodesic Analysis, Scientific Small-World Analysis	Degree of Collaboration, Collaborative Coefficient, Co-Authorship Intensity, Collaboration Index
関連	3	3
概要	Collaboration distance analysis measures how closely connected scientists are through chains of co-authorship. Two researchers who have written a paper together are at distance 1; if they share a co-author but never wrote together, distance 2; and so on. The most famous instance is the Erdős number, the collaboration distance to the prolific mathematician Paul Erdős, popularized by the Erdős Number Project and analyzed by Rodrigo de Castro and Jerrold Grossman. M. E. J. Newman's landmark 2001 PNAS study generalized this idea, constructing large co-authorship networks across physics, biomedicine, and computer science and showing that they are 'small worlds': despite millions of authors, typical shortest paths are short and local clustering is high. Collaboration distance analysis thus characterizes the connectivity and reach of scientific communities through the geometry of their co-authorship graphs.	The Scientific Collaboration Index family quantifies how collaborative a body of research is by analyzing the number of authors per paper. In his influential 1983 review of bibliometric studies of research collaboration, K. Subramanyam consolidated the main measures: the Degree of Collaboration (the proportion of multi-authored papers), the Collaboration Index (the mean number of authors per paper), and related indicators. S. M. Lawani and later Ajiferuke and colleagues refined these into the Collaborative Coefficient, which weights papers by how many authors share them while keeping the index bounded. Together these indices give simple, comparable summaries of co-authorship intensity that have documented the long-term rise of team science across nearly every field, and they remain standard descriptive tools in scientometrics, library science, and research-policy studies of collaboration.