手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Combined Compromise Solution×基準インパクト損失客観重み付け法×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20192016
提唱者Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
種類Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
原典Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ Download slides

ScholarGate手法を比較: COCOSO · CILOS. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare