ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ランダム化比較試験のためのコクランのリスク・バイアス評価ツール2.0×CASP ランダム化比較試験チェックリスト×
分野研究方法論研究方法論
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20191993 (updated through 2023)
提唱者Jonathan Sterne, Julian Higgins (Cochrane Collaboration)Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK)
種類Clinician-rated / Research team assessmentClinician-rated / Research team assessment
原典Sterne, J. A., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., ... & Higgins, J. P. (2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. DOI ↗Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗
別名RoB 2.0, RoB 2CASP-RCT, CASP
関連44
概要RoB 2 is the Cochrane Collaboration's updated methodology for assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Published in 2019, it replaced the original Cochrane RoB tool with a more structured, transparent approach using signalling questions and domain-based judgments to evaluate five critical sources of bias.The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Cochrane RoB 2.0 · CASP RCT Checklist. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare