ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

粗化完全マッチング(CEM)×傾向スコア重み付け(PSW / IPW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年2011-20121983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
提唱者Iacus, King, & PorroRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
種類Matching / causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
原典Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
別名CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matchingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
関連66
概要Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Coarsened Exact Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare