手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 粗化完全マッチング(CEM)× | 傾向スコア重み付け(PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2011-2012 | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| 提唱者≠ | Iacus, King, & Porro | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| 種類≠ | Matching / causal inference | Causal inference / reweighting |
| 原典≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|