ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

共起語分析×スコーピングレビュー×
分野科学計量学科学計量学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19832005
提唱者Michel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleaguesHilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
種類Scientometric network analysis techniqueEvidence synthesis review design
原典Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
別名keyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWAscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
関連66
概要Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Co-word Analysis · Scoping Review. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare