ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

クラスターランダム化比較試験×フィールド実験×
分野臨床研究実験計画法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1999-20001920s–1930s (agriculture); 1990s–2000s (social sciences)
提唱者Campbell, Grimshaw, Elbourne et al.Formalized by R. A. Fisher (1935); systematized in social sciences by Harrison & List (2004)
種類Research DesignExperimental design
原典Campbell, M. K., Grimshaw, J. M., & Elbourne, D. R. (2000). Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 30. link ↗Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055. DOI ↗
別名CRT, cluster RCT, cluster trial, group randomizationfield trial, natural field experiment, randomized field experiment, field RCT
関連35
概要A cluster randomized trial (CRT) randomizes intact groups—schools, clinics, villages, or hospital wards—rather than individuals. Developed by Campbell, Grimshaw, and colleagues in the late 1990s to address real-world settings where intervention delivery or contamination occurs at the group level, CRTs are now standard for evaluating population-level, community-based, and policy interventions.A field experiment applies the logic of a randomized controlled trial in a naturally occurring, real-world environment rather than an artificial laboratory. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions while going about everyday activities, allowing researchers to estimate causal effects with high internal validity while preserving a level of ecological realism that laboratory settings cannot offer. The design is especially prominent in economics, public health, political science, and development research.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Cluster Randomized Trial · Field Experiment. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare