ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

古典的グラウンデッド・セオリー×ナラティブ分析×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19671967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook)
提唱者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussCatherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967)
種類Qualitative research methodQualitative interpretive method
原典Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗
別名Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GTnarrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis)
関連66
概要Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks.Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Classic Grounded Theory · Narrative Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare