ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

古典的グラウンデッド・セオリー×ケーススタディリサーチ(Case Study Research)×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19671984 (seminal codification)
提唱者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussRobert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984)
種類Qualitative research methodQualitative research design
原典Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
別名Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GTVaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology
関連65
概要Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks.Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Classic Grounded Theory · Case Study. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare