手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 因果発見アルゴリズム (PC, FCI, LiNGAM)× | DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) による因果推論特定 (do-calculus)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000 | 2009 |
| 提唱者≠ | Spirtes, Glymour & Scheines (PC/FCI); Shimizu et al. (LiNGAM) | Judea Pearl |
| 種類≠ | Causal structure learning | Causal identification framework |
| 原典≠ | Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0262194402 | Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606 |
| 別名≠ | PC algorithm, FCI algorithm, LiNGAM, causal structure learning | do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus) |
| 関連 | 5 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Causal discovery is a family of algorithms that automatically learn a directed acyclic graph (DAG) describing causal structure directly from observational data. The constraint-based PC and FCI algorithms were developed by Spirtes, Glymour and Scheines (2000), while the LiNGAM model of Shimizu et al. (2006) exploits linear non-Gaussian structure to orient edges. | DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|