手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Candidate Evaluation Model× | Feeling Thermometer Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 政治心理学 | 政治心理学 |
| 系統≠ | Latent structure | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1995 | 1964 |
| 提唱者≠ | Milton Lodge, Marco Steenbergen & Donald Kinder | American National Election Studies / Aage Clausen |
| 種類≠ | Latent evaluation model | Affect rating instrument |
| 原典≠ | Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309-326. DOI ↗ | Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | Impression-Driven Evaluation Model, Online Processing Model, Candidate Trait Evaluation Model | Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating Scale |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | A candidate evaluation model represents how voters form overall assessments of political candidates as a latent function of perceived traits (competence, leadership, integrity, empathy), partisanship, issue proximity, and affect. It spans the trait-based factor models of Kinder et al. (1980) and the online-processing tally model of Lodge, Steenbergen and Brau (1995), which describes evaluation as a running summary updated as information arrives. | The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|