ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Bland-Altman法 比較分析×コーエンのカッパ係数×
分野統計学統計学
系統Hypothesis testHypothesis test
提唱年19861960
提唱者J. Martin Bland & Douglas G. AltmanJacob Cohen
種類Graphical and statistical method comparisonInter-rater reliability coefficient
原典Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. DOI ↗Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. DOI ↗
別名Bland-Altman plot, limits of agreement analysis, method agreement analysis, Bland-Altman Uyum Analizikappa coefficient, kappa statistic, Cohen's Kappa (Değerlendiriciler Arası Uyum)
関連53
概要The Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population.Cohen's kappa (κ) is a statistical measure of inter-rater reliability for categorical classifications, introduced by Jacob Cohen in 1960. Unlike simple percent agreement, kappa corrects for the level of agreement that would be expected purely by chance, making it the standard metric when two raters independently assign observations to the same set of mutually exclusive categories.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Bland-Altman Analysis · Cohen's Kappa. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare