ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

書誌計量分析×共起語分析×
分野科学計量学科学計量学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s1983
提唱者Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)Michel Callon, Jean-Pierre Courtial, and colleagues
種類Quantitative literature analysisScientometric network analysis technique
原典Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗
別名bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysiskeyword co-occurrence analysis, co-word mapping, keyword co-word network, CWA
関連66
概要Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.Co-word analysis is a scientometric technique that quantifies how often pairs of keywords, subject terms, or title words appear together across a corpus of publications. By treating simultaneous occurrence as a proxy for conceptual relatedness, it constructs networks and clusters that reveal the intellectual structure, dominant themes, and emerging sub-fields of a research domain.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Bibliometric Analysis · Co-word Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare