手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ベイジアン構成概念妥当性評価× | 収束的妥当性× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1955 / 2012 | 1959 |
| 提唱者≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (validity framework); Muthén & Asparouhov (Bayesian SEM extension) | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 種類≠ | Validity assessment / Bayesian inference | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 原典≠ | Muthén, B. & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | Bayesian validity analysis, Bayesian CFA-based validity, Bayesian structural validity, posterior construct validity | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Bayesian construct validity assessment uses Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis and related Bayesian structural equation models to evaluate whether a scale or test measures the intended latent construct. It yields full posterior distributions for factor loadings, structural coefficients, and model-fit indices rather than single point estimates, enabling more nuanced and uncertainty-aware validity conclusions. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|