手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ベイジアン構成概念妥当性評価× | 確認的因子分析（CFA）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1955 / 2012 | 1969 |
| 提唱者≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (validity framework); Muthén & Asparouhov (Bayesian SEM extension) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 種類≠ | Validity assessment / Bayesian inference | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 原典≠ | Muthén, B. & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | Bayesian validity analysis, Bayesian CFA-based validity, Bayesian structural validity, posterior construct validity | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Bayesian construct validity assessment uses Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis and related Bayesian structural equation models to evaluate whether a scale or test measures the intended latent construct. It yields full posterior distributions for factor loadings, structural coefficients, and model-fit indices rather than single point estimates, enabling more nuanced and uncertainty-aware validity conclusions. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|