手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| オートエスノグラフィー× | 談話分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提唱者≠ | Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979 | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| 原典≠ | Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | auto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 概要≠ | Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|