手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 著者の帰属推定(文体測定学)× | Forensic Likelihood Ratio× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | テキストマイニング | 法科学 |
| 系統≠ | Machine learning | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2009 | 2004 |
| 提唱者≠ | Mosteller & Wallace; Stamatatos | Colin Aitken & Franco Taroni |
| 種類≠ | Supervised stylometric classification | Bayesian evidence evaluation model |
| 原典≠ | Stamatatos, E. (2009). A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 538–556. DOI ↗ | Aitken, C. G. G., & Taroni, F. (2004). Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-470-84367-3 |
| 別名 | Stylometry, Authorship Analysis, Yazarlık Atıfı, Authorship Identification | Bayes Factor in Forensics, Forensic Evidence Weight, LR-Based Forensic Evaluation, Adli Olabilirlik Oranı |
| 関連 | 3 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Authorship attribution is the task of identifying the most probable author of an anonymous or disputed text by analysing its stylistic fingerprint. Rooted in the statistical work of Mosteller and Wallace on the Federalist Papers (1964), the field was systematically surveyed and formalised by Stamatatos (2009), who catalogued feature sets ranging from character n-grams and function-word frequencies to syntactic and semantic representations used by modern machine-learning classifiers. | The Forensic Likelihood Ratio (LR) is a Bayesian framework for quantifying the weight of forensic evidence relative to two competing propositions — typically the prosecution and defence hypotheses. Formally developed and systematised by Colin Aitken and Franco Taroni in their 2004 Wiley monograph, the LR expresses how much more probable the observed evidence is under one hypothesis than under the other, providing the court with a single, interpretable number that separates the scientist's role from the fact-finder's role. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|