ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

監査リスクモデル×継続企業の評価×
分野会計学会計学
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19831988
提唱者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
種類Professional auditing frameworkAudit assessment and reporting framework
原典American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
別名Risk-Based Audit Planning ModelGoing Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity Evaluation
関連43
概要The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion.Going Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Audit Risk Model · Going Concern Evaluation. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare