ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

監査リスクモデル×不正リスク評価×
分野会計学会計学
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19832002
提唱者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
種類Professional auditing frameworkFraud risk assessment and audit procedure framework
原典American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
別名Risk-Based Audit Planning ModelFraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud Assessment
関連44
概要The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion.Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Audit Risk Model · Fraud Risk Assessment. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare