ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Audit Experiment×Field Experiment in Politics×
分野Political SciencePolitical Science
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20112000
提唱者Butler & Broockman (political responsiveness audits); Bertrand & Mullainathan (correspondence-audit lineage)Gerber & Green (modern political field experiments)
種類Randomized field experiment using matched fictitious requestsRandomized experiment conducted in a real political setting
原典Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI ↗Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653–663. DOI ↗
別名Correspondence study, Field audit study, Discrimination audit, Responsiveness auditPolitical field experiment, Get-out-the-vote experiment, GOTV experiment, Voter mobilization experiment
関連44
概要An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.A field experiment in political science randomizes a real intervention — such as a get-out-the-vote canvass, mailing, or phone call — among genuine political actors in their natural environment and compares behavioral outcomes like validated turnout. Revived for the discipline by Gerber and Green's 2000 voter-mobilization study and codified in their 2012 textbook, the approach combines the causal leverage of randomization with the realism of consequential, real-world settings, while carefully distinguishing the effect of being assigned a treatment from the effect of actually receiving it.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Audit Experiment · Field Experiment in Politics. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare