ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

加法比率評価×平均解からの評価×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20102015
提唱者Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z.
種類Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Distance from average solution
原典Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: ARAS · EDAS. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare