手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 加法比率評価× | 複合比例評価法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 2010 | 1996 |
| 提唱者≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| 種類≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| 原典≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|