ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

加法比率評価×基準相関と標準偏差による客観的重み付け×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20102010
提唱者Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
種類Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
原典Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: ARAS · CCSD. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare