手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Anticipatory Governance Analysis× | Co-Production Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2008 | 2004 |
| 提唱者≠ | David H. Guston, Daniel Barben, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin | Sheila Jasanoff |
| 種類≠ | Governance framework and analytic approach for emerging technologies | Interpretive analytic framework (idiom) in science and technology studies |
| 原典≠ | Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218-242. DOI ↗ | Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge. ISBN: 9780415403290 |
| 別名 | Anticipatory governance framework, Foresight-engagement-integration analysis, Reflexive technology governance | Co-production idiom, Co-productionist analysis, Knowledge and social order analysis |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Anticipatory governance is a framework for steering emerging technologies—nanotechnology, synthetic biology, AI—while their trajectories are still open, rather than waiting to react to harms after they have hardened. Developed by David Guston and colleagues at the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University, it defines anticipatory governance as a broad societal capacity, distributed across the research enterprise and the public, built from three intertwined components: foresight, public engagement, and integration. The aim is not to predict the future but to build the reflexive capacity to imagine plausible futures and act on them wisely in the present. | Co-production analysis applies the 'idiom of co-production' developed by Sheila Jasanoff: the claim that the ways we know the world are inseparable from the ways we choose to live in it. Scientific knowledge and social order are not produced in separate spheres that later interact; they are produced together. Co-production analysis traces this simultaneous making of natural and social facts—how a new way of knowing nature is bound up with new identities, institutions, discourses, and representations that together stabilise both knowledge and political order. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|