手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Analytic Network Process (フィードバックと相互依存性を考慮したAHP)× | 複合比例評価法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年 | 1996 | 1996 |
| 提唱者≠ | Saaty, T. L. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| 種類≠ | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| 原典≠ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|