ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

監査における分析的手続×内部統制評価×
分野会計学会計学
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19831992
提唱者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)
種類Audit procedure methodologyComprehensive control evaluation framework
原典American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗
別名Analytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend AnalysisCOSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control Assessment
関連44
概要Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Analytical Procedures in Auditing · Internal Control Evaluation. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare