ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

監査における分析的手続×監査リスクモデル×
分野会計学会計学
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19831983
提唱者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
種類Audit procedure methodologyProfessional auditing framework
原典American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
別名Analytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend AnalysisRisk-Based Audit Planning Model
関連44
概要Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Analytical Procedures in Auditing · Audit Risk Model. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare