ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

エージェントベースセルオートマトン×多目的セル・オートマトン×
分野シミュレーションシミュレーション
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1986–19961990s–2000s
提唱者Wolfram, S.; Epstein, J. M. & Axtell, R.Various (Liu et al., White & Engelen, Clarke et al.)
種類Hybrid spatial simulationHybrid simulation-optimization
原典Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL. ISBN: 978-1579550080Liu, X., Liang, X., Li, X., Xu, X., Ou, J., Chen, Y., Li, S., Wang, S., Pei, F. (2017). A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landscape and Urban Planning, 168, 94-116. DOI ↗
別名ABCA, CA-ABM, Agent-CA, Hybrid Agent-Cellular AutomatonMOCA, Multi-objective CA, Multi-criteria cellular automata, MO-CA
関連65
概要Agent-Based Cellular Automata (ABCA) is a hybrid simulation framework that integrates the local transition rules of cellular automata with the autonomous behavioral logic of agent-based modeling. Cells in a spatial grid both evolve according to neighborhood rules and host agents that perceive, decide, and act, enabling the study of complex spatial phenomena such as land-use change, disease spread, crowd dynamics, and ecosystem evolution.Multi-Objective Cellular Automata (MOCA) couples the bottom-up spatial dynamics of cellular automata with multi-objective optimization to simultaneously pursue competing goals — such as maximizing urban compactness while minimizing ecosystem loss. Each grid cell updates its state based on transition rules that are calibrated or steered to satisfy a Pareto-optimal trade-off among two or more objectives, making the method widely used in land-use change simulation, urban growth modeling, and spatial planning under conflicting demands.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Agent-based cellular automata · Multi-objective cellular automata. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare