ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

アクションリサーチ×ナラティブ分析×
分野質的研究質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19461967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook)
提唱者Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyCatherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967)
種類MethodQualitative interpretive method
原典Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗
別名Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquirynarrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis)
関連16
概要Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Action Research · Narrative Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare