ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Acceptability Judgment Task×Grammaticality Judgment Task×
分野言語学言語学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19961965
提唱者Experimental-syntax researchers (Jon Sprouse; Ellen Bard, Antonella Sorace)Noam Chomsky (generative-linguistics tradition)
種類Quantified rating of sentence well-formednessIntrospective elicitation of linguistic competence
原典Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua, 134, 219–248. DOI ↗Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262530071
別名Acceptability Judgement Task, AJT, Sentence Acceptability Rating, Experimental Syntax Judgment TaskGrammaticality Judgement Task, GJT, Sentence Grammaticality Judgment
関連33
概要The acceptability judgment task is the modern, quantified successor to informal grammaticality judgments: instead of a single linguist marking a sentence grammatical or not, many participants rate carefully controlled sentences on a graded scale, and the ratings are analyzed statistically. Built on factorial designs with fillers and counterbalancing, and on response formats from Likert scales to magnitude estimation to forced choice, it turns intuition into replicable, gradient data. The approach anchors the experimental-syntax program associated with Jon Sprouse and colleagues, which tests grammatical hypotheses with the same methodological rigor as psycholinguistic experiments.The grammaticality judgment task asks speakers to decide whether a sentence is grammatical — well-formed according to the rules of their language — and treats that decision as evidence about the mental grammar that produces it. Rooted in Noam Chomsky's generative program, where the native speaker's intuition is the primary data of linguistics, the task ranges from a single linguist consulting their own intuitions to large controlled experiments with binary, scaled, or forced-choice responses. It is a workhorse of syntactic theory and of second-language acquisition research, where it probes what learners know about a target language beyond what they can produce.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Acceptability Judgment Task · Grammaticality Judgment Task. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare