ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineBiblical exegesis / literary criticism of scripture

Intertextuality Analysis

Intertextuality analysis studies how one text invokes another, and in biblical studies it focuses on the dense web of allusion and echo by which later scripture reuses earlier scripture. When Paul quotes, paraphrases, or faintly echoes Israel's scriptures, the borrowed words carry their old context into the new, enriching and sometimes reshaping the meaning. Richard B. Hays's 1989 Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul made this study rigorous by proposing a set of criteria for deciding when an apparent echo is real and what it does. Drawing the term intertextuality from literary theory but giving it a controlled, text-critical application, Hays distinguished quotation, allusion, and the faintest echo, and showed how an evoked source text can transform a passage through the figure of metalepsis. The method gives disciplined criteria for a notoriously slippery interpretive judgment.

Apri in MethodMindIn arrivoApplica, confronta, ottieni indicazioni
Strumenti e risorse
Scarica le diapositive
Impara ed esplora
VideoIn arrivo

Leggi il metodo completo

Riservato ai membri

Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.

Accedi

Mappa dei metodi

Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.

Fonti

  1. Hays, R. B. (1989). Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300044713

Come citare questa pagina

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Intertextuality Analysis (Inner-Biblical Allusion and Echo). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/religious-studies/intertextuality-analysis

Quale metodo?

Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.

Confronta affiancati

Citato da

ScholarGateIntertextuality Analysis (Intertextuality Analysis (Inner-Biblical Allusion and Echo)). Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/religious-studies/intertextuality-analysis · Insieme di dati: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026