ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Scala Analogica Visiva per il Dolore×Scala del Coma di Glasgow×Scala Numerica di Valutazione del Dolore×
CampoValutazione clinicaValutazione clinicaServizi sanitari
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine197419741986
IdeatoreE. Carl HuskissonGraham Teasdale and Bryan JennettMark P. Jensen and colleagues
TipoPain intensity measurementConsciousness and neurological assessmentUnidimensional pain severity measurement
Fonte seminaleHuskisson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. Lancet, 2(7889), 1127-1131. DOI ↗Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2(7872), 81-84. DOI ↗Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain, 27(3), 297-307. DOI ↗
AliasVAS, Pain VAS, Visual Rating ScaleGCS, Glasgow ScaleNRS, NRS-11, NRS-101
Correlati222
SintesiThe Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10-centimeter line for measuring pain intensity, developed by Huskisson in 1974. Patients mark their current pain level along the continuum from no pain to worst pain imaginable. It remains one of the most widely used single-item pain measures in clinical practice and research.The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), developed by Teasdale and Jennett in 1974, is a 15-point scale used to assess level of consciousness and severity of brain injury. It evaluates eye opening, verbal response, and motor response, making it the gold standard tool for rapid neurological assessment in trauma, emergency, and intensive care settings.The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a single-item, self-report measure of pain intensity developed by Jensen and colleagues in 1986. Patients rate their pain on an 11-point scale (0-10) where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. The NRS is among the most widely used pain severity measures in clinical practice and research due to its simplicity, rapid administration, and robust measurement properties.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Visual Analog Scale for Pain · Glasgow Coma Scale · Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. Consultato il 2026-06-18 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare