ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Revisione sistematica a fette temporali×Mappatura della Scienza×
CampoScientometriaBibliometria
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine2010s2000s
IdeatoreAdapted from systematic review methodology; temporal segmentation formalized in bibliometric practice (Zupic & Cater, 2015; Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017)Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others
TipoSystematic review variant with temporal segmentationMethod
Fonte seminaleZupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. DOI ↗Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗
Aliastemporal systematic review, period-based systematic review, chronological systematic review, time-segmented literature reviewknowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization
Correlati55
SintesiA time-sliced systematic literature review applies the rigorous search, screening, and synthesis protocol of a standard systematic review while dividing the retrieved corpus into discrete temporal periods — time slices — and analyzing each period separately. This design reveals how a research field has developed across time: which topics emerged, grew, or declined; how key authors and journals shifted; and how intellectual structures evolved from one era to the next.Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Time-sliced Systematic literature review · Science Mapping. Consultato il 2026-06-19 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare