Confronta i metodi

	SWARA II	CRITIC-M	Analisi del Rapporto di Valutazione del Peso Passo-Passo
Campo	Processo decisionale	Processo decisionale	Processo decisionale
Famiglia	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Anno di origine	2010	1995	2010
Ideatore	Keršuliene, Zavadskas, and Turskis; extended by Zolfani et al.	Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed later	Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
Tipo	Expert-based stepwise weight derivation with ratio refinement	Objective weight derivation via correlation and variance	Sequential step-ratio subjective weighting
Fonte seminale	Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by evaluating opposing parties' interest in civil litigation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(3), 412-422.	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.	Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management
Alias	SWARA II, SWARA 2	CRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC	—
Correlati	4	3	8
Sintesi	SWARA II (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis - Improved) is an enhanced variant of the SWARA method for deriving criterion weights from expert assessments. Instead of requiring pairwise comparisons or absolute weight assignments, SWARA II asks experts to rank criteria, then assess the relative importance of each criterion compared to the next-ranked one. Improved variants enhance robustness and interpretability of weight derivation.	CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability.	SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.