ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Studio retrospettivo sull'accuratezza diagnostica×Valutazione dei test di screening×
CampoEpidemiologiaEpidemiologia
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origineFormalized 2000s; STARD 2003, revised 20151968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
IdeatoreFormalized through the STARD initiative led by Patrick Bossuyt and colleaguesWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
TipoObservational, retrospective study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
Fonte seminaleBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., et al. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
Aliasretrospective DAS, retrospective test accuracy study, retrospective index test evaluation, historical diagnostic accuracy studyscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
Correlati56
SintesiA retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a diagnostic test (the index test) correctly identifies a target condition by applying it to previously collected data or archived specimens alongside a reference standard. Because both index test results and reference standard results are drawn from existing records or stored material rather than generated prospectively, this design is faster and less costly than a prospective counterpart — but carries specific methodological risks that must be controlled to produce valid estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related measures.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study · Screening Test Evaluation. Consultato il 2026-06-17 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare