ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Disegno Pragmatico a Metodi Misti Quantitativamente Dominante×Disegno pragmatico a metodi misti×
CampoDisegno della ricercaDisegno della ricerca
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine1998–2010Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
IdeatoreTashakkori & Teddlie (mixed methods paradigm discourse); pragmatic strand systematized by Morgan and CreswellJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
TipoMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Fonte seminaleTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
AliasQUAN-dominant pragmatic MMR, pragmatic quantitative-priority mixed design, quan-priority pragmatic designpragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
Correlati66
SintesiA mixed methods design in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight while a smaller qualitative component provides contextual depth. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism, design decisions — including timing, sequencing, and the scope of each strand — are driven by what best answers the research question rather than by adherence to a single paradigmatic tradition.Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Quantitative-dominant pragmatic mixed methods · Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design. Consultato il 2026-06-18 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare