Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Design Concorrente Incorporato a Dominanza Qualitativa× | Disegno a metodi misti con priorità qualitativa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Disegno della ricerca | Disegno della ricerca |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 2003–2011 | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| Ideatore≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark (embedded design); dominance weighting formalized in Teddlie & Tashakkori | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tipo | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Alias | QUAL-dominant embedded concurrent design, qualitative-priority embedded mixed methods, concurrent nested mixed methods (QUAL dominant), QUAL+quan concurrent embedded design | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| Correlati≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Sintesi≠ | A qualitative-dominant concurrent embedded mixed methods design collects qualitative and quantitative data simultaneously, but the qualitative strand carries the primary weight — it drives the research questions, generates the main findings, and frames interpretation. The quantitative strand is embedded within the larger qualitative study to provide supplemental support, context-setting, or triangulation, without displacing the qualitative logic at the core. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|