Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Invarianza di misurazione politoma× | Analisi Fattoriale Confermativa Multi-Gruppo (MG-CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Psicometria | Psicometria |
| Famiglia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anno di origine≠ | 2000–2004 | 1971 |
| Ideatore≠ | Roger E. Millsap, Robert J. Vandenberg | Karl Jöreskog |
| Tipo≠ | Multi-group confirmatory test | Measurement model / invariance test |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Millsap, R. E. & Kwok, O.-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factor loading and intercept invariance on selection utility. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 200–215. link ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | PMI, ordinal measurement invariance, polytomous factorial invariance, polytomous multi-group measurement invariance | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA |
| Correlati≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Sintesi≠ | Polytomous measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a scale with ordered categorical (polytomous) response options — such as Likert-type items — measures the same latent construct in the same way across two or more groups. It extends classical multi-group CFA invariance testing to properly account for the ordinal nature of item responses, ensuring that group comparisons of latent means or factor structures are substantively valid. | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|