Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Codifica aperta× | Analisi del Discorso× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Qualitativo | Ricerca qualitativa |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1967 (Glaser & Strauss); refined 1990 (Strauss & Corbin) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Ideatore≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic grounded theory); elaborated by Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Alias | initial coding, open categorisation, substantive coding | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Correlati≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Sintesi≠ | Open coding is the first, exploratory phase of qualitative data analysis in which raw text — interviews, field notes, or documents — is broken into discrete segments and labelled with short descriptive codes. Developed within grounded theory by Glaser and Strauss and later elaborated by Strauss and Corbin, the procedure is deliberately open and inductive: the analyst reads line-by-line without imposing a predetermined framework, allowing concepts to emerge directly from the data. The resulting codes are then compared and grouped into provisional categories that become the building blocks for subsequent, more selective analysis. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|