ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Nuovo metodo per la determinazione dei pesi oggettivi dei criteri×AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation)×
CampoProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionale
FamigliaMCDMMCDM
Anno di origine20172022
IdeatoreBulut, E.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipoWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Fonte seminaleBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Alias
Correlati88
SintesiNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: NMD · AROMAN. Consultato il 2026-06-17 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare