Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| COPRAS-IN× | Processo Gerarchico Analitico× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Processo decisionale | Processo decisionale |
| Famiglia | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anno di origine≠ | 2019 | 1980 |
| Ideatore≠ | Şahin, R. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tipo≠ | Interval Neutrosophic ranking — INN: <[T_L,T_U],[I_L,I_U],[F_L,F_U]> with 0 ≤ T_U+I_U+F_U ≤ 3 | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Şahin, R. (2019). COPRAS Method with Neutrosophic Sets. Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 369, Springer, Cham DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Correlati≠ | 7 | 8 |
| Sintesi≠ | N-COPRAS (COPRAS-IN — COPRAS with Interval Neutrosophic Numbers (INN)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Şahin, R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|