ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Estensione neutrosifica di AROMAN×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
CampoProcesso decisionaleProcesso decisionale
FamigliaMCDMMCDM
Anno di origine20232025
IdeatoreBošković et al.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
TipoNeutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
Fonte seminaleBošković et al. (2023). Neutrosophic Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for two-step Normalization. IEEE Access link ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Alias
Correlati88
SintesiN-AROMAN (Neutrosophic extension of AROMAN) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković et al. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: N-AROMAN · CIMAS. Consultato il 2026-06-18 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare