Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| MMAT× | GRADE Evidence Profiling× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Metodologia della ricerca | Metodologia della ricerca |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 2014 (updated 2018) | 2008 |
| Ideatore≠ | Pluye et al. | Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group) |
| Tipo≠ | Research methodology evaluation | Research team / Guideline panel assessment |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 29–45. DOI ↗ | Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | MMAT, MMAT 2018 | GRADE, GRADE approach |
| Correlati | 4 | 4 |
| Sintesi≠ | MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) is a practical, design-agnostic quality assessment tool developed by Pluye et al. (2014, updated 2018) to evaluate the methodological quality of quantitative (RCTs, non-randomized studies), qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Unlike tools designed for single paradigms (e.g., Cochrane RoB 2 for RCTs), MMAT provides unified criteria applicable across diverse research methodologies, making it particularly useful for systematic reviews incorporating multiple study designs. | GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|