ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

MAIHDA×Intersectionality Analysis×
CampoGender StudiesGender Studies
FamigliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine20181989
IdeatoreClare Evans & S. V. Subramanian (building on Juan Merlo)Kimberlé Crenshaw
TipoCross-classified random-effects multilevel modelCritical qualitative analytic framework
Fonte seminaleEvans, C. R., Williams, D. R., Onnela, J.-P., & Subramanian, S. V. (2018). A multilevel approach to modeling health inequalities at the intersection of multiple social identities. Social Science & Medicine, 203, 64–73. DOI ↗Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗
AliasIntersectional MAIHDA, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy, Intersectional Multilevel AnalysisIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Correlati34
SintesiMAIHDA — Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy — is a quantitative method for studying intersectional inequalities. Introduced for intersectionality by Clare Evans and S. V. Subramanian in 2018, building on Juan Merlo's discriminatory-accuracy framework, it treats the many strata formed by crossing social categories (for example gender × race/ethnicity × education) as level-2 units in a multilevel model, then partitions outcome variation between and within those strata to assess how much intersectional position predicts the outcome.Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: MAIHDA · Intersectionality Analysis. Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare