ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

List Experiment×Survey Experiment×
CampoPolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine20112011
IdeatoreSurvey methodology; modern estimators by Kosuke Imai, Graeme Blair, Adam GlynnExperimental political science; synthesized by Diana Mutz
TipoSensitive-question survey experimentRandomized experiment embedded in a survey
Fonte seminaleImai, K. (2011). Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494), 407–416. DOI ↗Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691144528
AliasItem count technique, Unmatched count technique, Item count method, List randomizationPopulation-based survey experiment, Survey-embedded experiment, Question-wording experiment, Framing experiment
Correlati34
SintesiThe list experiment, also called the item count technique, is a survey design that measures the prevalence of a sensitive attitude or behavior without ever requiring any respondent to directly disclose it. Respondents are randomly split into two groups: a control group sees a list of innocuous items and reports only how many apply to them, while a treatment group sees the same list plus one sensitive item. Because respondents report only a count, no individual answer reveals their stance on the sensitive item, and the difference in average counts between the groups estimates the proportion holding the sensitive trait.A survey experiment embeds a randomized experiment inside a survey: respondents are randomly assigned to different versions of a question, frame, or stimulus, and their answers are compared to estimate a causal effect. By combining the internal validity of randomization with the representative samples and rich measurement of survey research, survey experiments — especially population-based ones — let political scientists draw causal inferences about how information, framing, or message attributes shape public attitudes and behavior.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: List Experiment · Survey Experiment. Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare