Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Modello a Risposta Graduata (GRM)× | Analisi Fattoriale Confermativa (AFC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo≠ | Psicometria | Statistica |
| Famiglia | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anno di origine | 1969 | 1969 |
| Ideatore≠ | Fumiko Samejima | Karl Jöreskog |
| Tipo≠ | Item response theory / polytomous IRT model | Confirmatory latent variable model |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, No. 17. link ↗ | Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462515363 |
| Alias | Samejima's GRM, Derecelendirilmiş Tepki Modeli (GRM), graded IRT model | Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (CFA), confirmatory factor analysis, measurement model |
| Correlati≠ | 7 | 4 |
| Sintesi≠ | The Graded Response Model is an item response theory model developed by Fumiko Samejima in 1969 for ordered polytomous items such as Likert-type scales. It estimates both the discriminating power of each item and a set of threshold parameters marking the boundaries between adjacent response categories, while simultaneously placing persons on a continuous latent trait scale. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a researcher-specified factor structure fits the observed data. Formalised by Karl Jöreskog in 1969, it is the measurement-model step within structural equation modelling and is the standard tool for validating the factorial structure of scales and questionnaires before comparing groups or estimating latent relationships. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|