ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Design quantitativo-prioritario misto orientato alla valutazione×Disegno pragmatico a metodi misti×
CampoDisegno della ricercaDisegno della ricerca
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine2003–2011Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
IdeatoreTeddlie & Tashakkori; Creswell & Plano ClarkJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
TipoMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Fonte seminaleTeddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
AliasQUAN-priority evaluation mixed methods, quantitative-dominant evaluation design, evaluation mixed methods with quantitative priority, QUAN-priority eval MMRpragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
Correlati66
SintesiAn evaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods design applies mixed methods inquiry within an evaluation context, where the primary purpose is judging a program, policy, or intervention. Quantitative data carry the greater evidential weight — measuring outcomes, effectiveness, and reach — while qualitative data serve as a secondary, explanatory strand that contextualizes and deepens interpretation of the quantitative findings.Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Evaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods design · Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design. Consultato il 2026-06-17 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare