Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Ecomap Analysis× | Goal Attainment Scaling× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Social Work | Social Work |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1978 | 1968 |
| Ideatore≠ | Ann Hartman | Thomas J. Kiresuk & Robert E. Sherman |
| Tipo≠ | Graphical, qualitative person-in-environment assessment tool | Individualized, criterion-referenced outcome measurement procedure |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Hartman, A. (1978). Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Social Casework, 59(8), 465–476. DOI ↗ | Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4(6), 443–453. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | Ecomap, Eco-Map, Ecological Map, Hartman Ecomap | GAS, Goal Attainment Scale, Kiresuk-Sherman Goal Attainment Scaling, Individualized Goal Scaling |
| Correlati | 3 | 3 |
| Sintesi≠ | An ecomap is a graphical map of a household or individual set within their social environment, showing the connections between the focal system and the external systems around it — extended family, work, school, health care, friends, agencies, religion, and recreation — and coding each connection as strong, tenuous, or stressful, with arrows for the flow of energy and resources. Ecomap analysis is the practice of drawing and interpreting this map to assess the person-in-environment, the central organizing concept of social work. It was introduced by Ann Hartman in 1978. | Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for measuring the outcomes of an individualized intervention by writing, in advance, a small set of client-specific goals and defining for each a graded scale of possible outcomes from much worse than expected to much better than expected. After the intervention, the actual outcome on each goal is scored on this scale and the scores are combined into a single standardized index, allowing idiosyncratic, personally meaningful goals to be aggregated and compared across clients and programs. It was introduced by Thomas Kiresuk and Robert Sherman in 1968 to evaluate community mental health programs. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|